Bushmaster ACR vs. FN SCAR: Which Modular Rifle Is Better?

Introduction

The Bushmaster ACR and FN SCAR are two of the most well-known modular rifles, each designed with adaptability and versatility in mind. Both rifles feature quick caliber conversions, ambidextrous controls, and are suited for a variety of combat or tactical situations. However, despite their similarities, there are key differences in performance, weight, handling, and price, which may sway buyers toward one rifle over the other. This comparison breaks down the pros and cons of both rifles to help you decide which is the better choice for you​.

Bushmaster ACR Overview

Advantages

1. Modularity: The Bushmaster ACR was designed with quick barrel and caliber changes in mind. This makes it adaptable for various missions, whether it’s close-quarters combat or long-range engagements. Many users praise its ability to switch between configurations with ease​.

    

2. Ambidextrous Controls: The ACR offers fully ambidextrous controls, including the magazine release, bolt catch, and bolt release, making it ideal for both left- and right-handed shooters.

    

3. Ergonomics: Users often appreciate the comfort and balance of the ACR. Although it’s front-heavy, the controls are positioned intuitively, making it easy to operate, especially during fast-paced scenarios​.

    

Disadvantages

1. Weight: One of the biggest complaints about the ACR is its weight. It is heavier than the SCAR, making it more cumbersome, especially during extended use. This can lead to shooter fatigue, particularly in dynamic situations.

    

2. Heat Build-Up: During prolonged firing sessions, the ACR tends to generate more heat, which can be felt through the handguards. This may affect comfort during sustained use.

    

FN SCAR Overview

Advantages

1. Weight and Balance: The FN SCAR is notably lighter than the ACR, making it easier to maneuver and more comfortable to carry over long distances. Its balance also makes it easier to transition between targets​.

    

2. Low Recoil: One of the SCAR’s standout features is its minimal recoil, making follow-up shots easier and reducing shooter fatigue. Its flash suppressing compensator helps keep recoil to a minimum, even during rapid firing.

    

3. Durable and Reliable: The FN SCAR is known for its reliability, especially in adverse conditions. Its free-floating barrel and tappet gas system contribute to its smooth shooting and long-lasting durability.

    

Disadvantages

1. Price: The SCAR is generally more expensive than the ACR, with models often retailing around $2,400 compared to the ACR’s $2,200. While both are pricey, some users feel that the SCAR’s higher cost doesn’t always justify the performance gain.

    

2. Ambidextrous Limitations: Although the SCAR features ambidextrous controls for most functions, it lacks an ambidextrous bolt release, which may be a drawback for some users.

    

Comparison

Modularity

Both the ACR and SCAR excel in modularity, allowing for quick caliber changes and customizable components. However, the ACR was specifically designed for easy, user-level barrel and caliber swaps, which gives it a slight edge in this department.

Weight and Handling

The SCAR wins in terms of weight and balance, making it easier to maneuver, especially in high-paced or dynamic environments. Its lighter build makes it more comfortable for long-term use and target transitions.

Recoil and Accuracy

The FN SCAR offers less recoil and more manageable shooting, making it the better choice for shooters who prioritize quick follow-up shots. Both rifles are surprisingly accurate for their class, but the SCAR’s overall control makes it a favorite among users looking for smooth operation​.

Conclusion

Choosing between the Bushmaster ACR and FN SCAR depends on your priorities. If you value modularity and ambidextrous controls, the ACR is an excellent choice. However, if you prioritize lightweight handling, low recoil, and a smoother shooting experience, the SCAR may be the better investment. Both rifles are reliable and accurate, but the SCAR edges out the ACR in balance and weight, while the ACR excels in user-level customization​.

FAQs